BagTrace

LETRO

Letronna · Pons V2 · ETH pair
0xa2753fd0bc86b8ceb55ffd2698679c7f214785f1
mcap $123.9Kliquidity $29.7Kage —updated …
GREEN · NO HIDDEN CONTROL FOUND
Rule: GREEN when no rule above matches

A rating of the token's supply on-chain, not of the project or its team. What the colour means

Share on X
Hidden control now<0.1%of supply · peak 0.6% · 240.0K tokens leftEvidence ↓
Extracted so far0 ETHby hidden actorsEvidence ↓
Selling nowNot sellinglast hour · 0 ETH in the last 10 minEvidence ↓

The creator (the wallet that sent the launch transaction) received 0.6% of the supply (outside its own liquidity positions) and then sent 0.6% to 1 other address, so the dev looks like it holds 0.0%. This is optics: it says nothing about who else it controls.

The creator burned its launch buy (dev 0% is cosmetic)

Last hours

Every trade of the token, by its real owner.

Net flow
−0.37 ETH out
Buys
430 · 18.32 ETH
Sells
315 · 18.69 ETH
Price
−4.5%
Volume
≈$76.2K
6h in buckets of 30 minutes
FromChangeNet flowBuys / sells
07:43 UTC−8.7%−0.38 ETH out8 / 11
07:11 UTC−3.0%−0.11 ETH out10 / 9
06:39 UTC+10.8%+0.42 ETH in30 / 6
06:06 UTC−24.7%−1.21 ETH out27 / 39
05:33 UTC+0.7%−0.0091 ETH out10 / 5
05:00 UTC−6.7%−0.32 ETH out14 / 12
04:27 UTC+21.6%+0.91 ETH in17 / 5
03:54 UTC−26.9%−1.44 ETH out34 / 31
03:20 UTC+30.4%+1.29 ETH in51 / 28
02:48 UTC+142.1%+3.17 ETH in100 / 56
02:16 UTC−15.2%−0.81 ETH out95 / 70
01:45 UTC−42.2%−1.88 ETH out34 / 43

Largest sellers

  1. 0x25db…d5f7via relayer 0x211d…d1723.64 ETHholds none
  2. 0x711b…199dvia relayer 0x6733…a8ae1.11 ETHholds none
  3. 0x750f…7d280.88 ETHholds none
  4. 0xe647…a7dd0.83 ETHholds none
  5. 0x46af…9a370.78 ETHholds none

Largest buyers

  1. 0x25db…d5f7via relayer 0xf42b…acec3.22 ETHsold it
  2. 0x39ad…e98c1.54 ETHstill holds
  3. 0xcf42…092evia relayer 0x211d…d1720.82 ETHstill holds
  4. 0x9a12…b9ef0.54 ETHstill holds
  5. 0x711b…199dvia relayer 0x6733…a8ae0.54 ETHsold it

What triggered the biggest move

At 03:15:43 UTC, 0x25db…d5f7 bought 0.17 ETH. 3 other wallets bought within 30 s: 0x0d3b…6741 (+9.2s), 0x4aac…3208 (+15.4s), 0x711b…199d (+19.3s). The price moved +70.7% in that 5-minute window.First trade: 0x78cb…8c06Latest move: −16.8% at 06:30 UTC — 0x25db…d5f7 sold 0.57 ETH, no one followed.0xb3b1…0be6

What the usual checks say

  • PassHoneypotcan sellA simulated buy and sell both went through.
  • PassBuy / sell taxbuy 0% / sell 0%The token itself takes no large cut. Pons pools also charge a 1% swap fee.
  • PassMint after launchnoneNo tokens were created after launch.
  • PassOwnerno ownerThe contract has no owner() function to control it.
  • PassLiquidity locklocked for goodThe graduation liquidity is held by the Pons locker, which cannot withdraw it.
  • PassContract templatestandard Pons tokenThe code is the standard Pons token.
  • PassWash volumevolume 5× liquidity24 h volume is in line with the liquidity.
  • PassOld token, new poolpool 0.0 h after graduationThe pool opened with the token's own graduation.

Most scanners stop here. Hidden supply is below.

Incident class

DEV-FACADE

Share view
Extracted by the operation
≈$0
0 ETH
Creator fees
15.78 ETH
Credited from this token by the Pons fee escrow; the creator claimed 11.35 ETH in 1 payout; claims include fees from other Pons tokens.Last claim: 0x01fe…ee3d
Peak supply held at once
0.6%
of LETRO's minted supply
Cashed out via
  • HELD
  • OTHER

The creator (the wallet that sent the launch transaction) received 0.6% of the supply (outside its own liquidity positions) and then sent 0.6% to 1 other address, so the dev looks like it holds 0.0%. This is optics: it says nothing about who else it controls.

Where the supply went

Tap or hover a flow to see its amount and the transactions behind it.

Creator → Its own wallets: 6.2M tokensMinted supply → Creator: 6.2M tokensMinted supply → Public buyers: 660.8M tokensMinted supply → Graduation liquidity: 204.1M tokensMinted supply → Still in Pons contracts: 81.6M tokensFast flippers → Sold into the pool: 41.3M tokensMinted supply → Fast flippers: 41.3M tokensMinted supply → Burned: 6.0M tokens

Who can move the price

Real holders only: the pool, lockers, routers and other contracts are left out. Bags hidden inside the pool are in the hidden actors below.

Top 10 real holders: 22.1% of supply = 93% of pool liquidity
If it sells what's left: price −88%, ≈4.63 ETH out
Top real holders (without the pool, lockers, routers or contracts)
WalletSupplyOf liquidity
0x4d35…3be64.0%16.6%
0x98c1…97813.0%12.5%
0x39ad…e98c2.6%10.8%
0xcf42…092e2.6%10.7%
0x69ac…25c82.4%10.0%
0xebfa…152b1.9%7.8%
0xd3a1…c1111.6%6.6%
0xe470…994f1.5%6.3%
0xd787…000b1.4%5.7%
0x7c34…40a91.4%5.7%
0x323d…f4411.3%5.5%
0x8a54…57201.2%5.1%
0xbd9c…8d7b1.2%5.1%
0x6086…739e1.2%4.8%
0x9065…8ee31.1%4.5%
0x3059…4d671.1%4.4%
0x9a12…b9ef1.0%4.3%
0x2411…7a2a1.0%4.3%
0x34de…d33a1.0%4.3%
0x3088…70671.0%4.3%

Estimate at current pool liquidity, selling all at once. Real impact is lower if sold slowly.

ETH extracted over timeUTC
00.5111-06 02:3411-07 20:2711-09 14:2011-11 08:14

Check it yourself

Price chart on DexScreenerToken on BlockscoutLaunch transactionProject on X

Hidden actors

Dev facade

0xf836cf3130c0afc83355f87a8db480f720f5f4aa

The creator (the wallet that sent the launch transaction) received 0.6% of the supply (outside its own liquidity positions) and then sent 0.6% to 1 other address, so the dev looks like it holds 0.0%. This is optics: it says nothing about who else it controls.

If it sells what's left: price −0%, ≈0.01 ETH outEstimate at current pool liquidity, selling all at once. Real impact is lower if sold slowly.
Controlled start → now0.6% → <0.1%
Extracted0 ETH
Sell wallets0
First seen19:13:15 UTC
1 more wallet in this group
0x90b4…2343
Evidence · key transactions
  1. 19:13:15 UTCLaunch buycreator received 0.62% of supply0xf6ea…37d1
  2. 02:10:37 UTCTransfercreator passed 0.62% of supply to 0x90b41aa7…0xbc22…b57e
All activity of this address on Blockscout