BagTrace

ROBOT

Robot · Pons V2 · USDG pair
0xdc1ea590c071a688d21abbca82c7bd84080fc243
mcap $16.9Kliquidity $10.6Kage —updated …
YELLOW · MINOR SIGNALS
  • Dev_facade with 13.0% / 0.00 ETH
Rule: YELLOW when a hidden actor holds 5% of supply at its peak or extracts 1 ETH

A rating of the token's supply on-chain, not of the project or its team. What the colour means

Share on X
Hidden control now13.0%of supply · peak 13.0% · 130.3M tokens leftEvidence ↓
Extracted so far0 USDG≈0 ETHEvidence ↓
Selling nowNot sellinglast hour · 0 ETH in the last 10 minEvidence ↓

The creator (the wallet that sent the launch transaction) received 13.0% of the supply (outside its own liquidity positions) and then sent 13.0% to 3 other addresses, so the dev looks like it holds 0.0%. This is optics: it says nothing about who else it controls.

Last hours

Every trade of the token, by its real owner.

Net flow
−0.28 ETH out
Buys
124 · 2.81 ETH
Sells
75 · 3.09 ETH
Price
−18.7%
Volume
≈$12.1K
6h in buckets of 30 minutes
FromChangeNet flowBuys / sells
07:43 UTC+7.0%+0.09 ETH in21 / 7
07:10 UTC−9.7%−0.13 ETH out22 / 7
06:38 UTC−27.5%−0.46 ETH out24 / 6
06:06 UTC−1.7%−0.03 ETH out1 / 3
05:33 UTC−15.0%−0.26 ETH out1 / 5
05:00 UTC−0.7%−0.01 ETH out1 / 2
04:27 UTC−14.1%−0.27 ETH out2 / 5
03:54 UTC−4.1%−0.08 ETH out5 / 9
03:20 UTC+32.7%+0.49 ETH in6 / 7
02:48 UTC+16.5%+0.24 ETH in17 / 10
02:16 UTC−14.3%−0.24 ETH out9 / 12
01:45 UTC+28.3%+0.38 ETH in15 / 2

Largest sellers

  1. 0xf49e…53860.57 ETHholds none
  2. 0x98c1…9781via relayer 0x4337…a3730.36 ETHholds none
  3. 0x25db…d5f7via relayer 0x42f5…5b500.28 ETHholds none
  4. 0x9fbb…14ba0.27 ETHholds none
  5. 0xa7f2…97b30.21 ETHholds none

Largest buyers

  1. 0x98c1…9781via relayer 0xca7d…45890.52 ETHsold it
  2. 0xf49e…53860.51 ETHsold it
  3. 0x9fbb…14ba0.25 ETHsold it
  4. 0xbb75…2cc7via relayer 0x359b…b3590.16 ETHstill holds
  5. 0x9843…418e0.10 ETHstill holds

What triggered the biggest move

At 02:50:46 UTC, 0x1ad7…29d6 bought 0.02 ETH. 3 other wallets bought within 30 s: 0xbb75…2cc7 (+11.7s), 0xf49e…5386 (+26.5s), 0x5f73…204c (+26.6s). The price moved +27.0% in that 5-minute window.First trade: 0xd9d8…715aLatest move: +12.8% at 07:50 UTC — 0xbb75…2cc7 bought 0.04 ETH, 2 others followed.0x2da3…72a6

What the usual checks say

  • PassHoneypotcan sellA simulated buy and sell both went through.
  • PassBuy / sell taxbuy 0% / sell 0%The token itself takes no large cut. Pons pools also charge a 1% swap fee.
  • PassMint after launchnoneNo tokens were created after launch.
  • PassOwnerno ownerThe contract has no owner() function to control it.
  • PassLiquidity locklocked for goodThe graduation liquidity is held by the Pons locker, which cannot withdraw it.
  • PassContract templatestandard Pons tokenThe code is the standard Pons token.
  • PassWash volumevolume 9× liquidity24 h volume is in line with the liquidity.
  • PassOld token, new poolpool 0.0 h after graduationThe pool opened with the token's own graduation.

Most scanners stop here. Hidden supply is below.

Incident class

DEV-FACADE

Share view
Extracted by the operation
≈$0
0 ETH · 0 USDG
Creator fees
—
Only measured for ETH pairs.
Peak supply held at once
13.0%
of ROBOT's minted supply
Cashed out via
  • HELD

The creator (the wallet that sent the launch transaction) received 13.0% of the supply (outside its own liquidity positions) and then sent 13.0% to 3 other addresses, so the dev looks like it holds 0.0%. This is optics: it says nothing about who else it controls.

Where the supply went

Tap or hover a flow to see its amount and the transactions behind it.

Creator → Its own wallets: 130.3M tokensMinted supply → Creator: 130.3M tokensMinted supply → Public buyers: 258.2M tokensMinted supply → Graduation liquidity: 204.1M tokensMinted supply → Still in Pons contracts: 81.6M tokensFast flippers → Sold into the pool: 320.3M tokensMinted supply → Fast flippers: 320.3M tokensMinted supply → Burned: 5.5M tokens

Who can move the price

Real holders only: the pool, lockers, routers and other contracts are left out. Bags hidden inside the pool are in the hidden actors below.

Top 10 real holders: 34.5% of supply = 55% of pool liquidity
If it sells what's left: price −77%, ≈2,752 USDG ≈ 1.34 ETH out
Top real holders (without the pool, lockers, routers or contracts)
WalletSupplyOf liquidity
0xe29d…f0b05.0%8.0%
0x125f…52bcHidden actor4.3%7.0%
0x0e1d…a599Hidden actor4.3%7.0%
0x0f19…ef69Hidden actor4.3%7.0%
0xdbff…ad4c4.2%6.7%
0x4d35…3be64.0%6.3%
0x9843…418e2.8%4.5%
0x0300…8bdd2.0%3.2%
0xa09f…1e9d1.8%2.9%
0xaeb1…04bb1.7%2.7%
0x84df…3d9d1.5%2.4%
0x23d4…8e141.2%2.0%
0xc910…c1791.1%1.8%
0xdf76…f05a1.1%1.7%
0xdd96…64530.8%1.3%
0x1ba3…e2830.8%1.2%
0xf4e3…44450.7%1.1%
0x5b63…c59f0.7%1.1%
0xa738…e7380.6%1.0%
0x17e9…413a0.6%1.0%

Estimate at current pool liquidity, selling all at once. Real impact is lower if sold slowly.

ETH extracted over timeUTC · dashed = estimate (≈ ETH equivalent)
00.5114:1420:1402:1408:14

Check it yourself

Price chart on DexScreenerToken on BlockscoutLaunch transactionProject on X

Hidden actors

Dev facade

0x13d4f1adc39f80eb382d67acd6bf3c7b5339462c

The creator (the wallet that sent the launch transaction) received 13.0% of the supply (outside its own liquidity positions) and then sent 13.0% to 3 other addresses, so the dev looks like it holds 0.0%. This is optics: it says nothing about who else it controls.

If it sells what's left: price −50%, ≈1,544 USDG ≈ 0.75 ETH outEstimate at current pool liquidity, selling all at once. Real impact is lower if sold slowly.
Controlled start → now13.0% → 13.0%
Extracted0 USDG≈0 ETH
Sell wallets0
First seen13:00:39 UTC
3 more wallets in this group
0x0e1d…a5990x0f19…ef690x125f…52bc
Evidence · key transactions
  1. 13:00:39 UTCLaunch buycreator received 13.03% of supply0x06e4…fc2a
  2. 13:00:47 UTCTransfercreator passed 4.34% of supply to 0x0e1d0098…0xb785…9473
  3. 13:00:47 UTCTransfercreator passed 4.34% of supply to 0x0f19a5fe…0x4041…8c24
  4. 13:00:48 UTCTransfercreator passed 4.34% of supply to 0x125f7fee…0xe9e3…dd85
All activity of this address on Blockscout